What Deno Hewson Wants Every Senior Leader to Know About Executive Coaching

Say "executive coaching" and most people picture a struggling leader being pulled aside for a performance intervention. Someone who missed targets. Someone the board is quietly preparing to replace.

That picture is close to backwards, and the confusion is expensive. It keeps capable people away from the one conversation that would actually move them, and it sends other people into coaching when what they need is clinical care.

So I sat down with Deno Hewson, a performance coach who works with senior leaders across Asia, to get the boundaries straight: what coaching actually is, where it overlaps with therapy, and where the two have to stay separate. If you're an ambitious professional in Hong Kong, or an HR leader weighing where the development budget should go, this is the part worth getting right.

“

We work with individuals who are already by and large performing well. We're not being brought in to fix a problem.

Deno Hewson, performance coach

Watch Video15:39

The Pressure at the Top Has Nowhere to Go

Seniority is isolating in a structural way that has nothing to do with how likeable you are. You can't vent to your team, because your team needs you to be the person who understands. Unloading on a partner who doesn't live inside your industry only goes so far. And telling the board you're unsure can trigger a confidence crisis, one that may or may not be fair but is absolutely real. As Deno put it, "it's lonely at the top." The people around a senior leader all need something from them, which leaves no one safe to be uncertain in front of.

So you carry it. You perform certainty and make the calls anyway. Over months or years the gap between how you feel and how you present widens until something gives, whether that's your sleep, your marriage, your drinking, or a flash of rage in a meeting you can't take back.

Hong Kong adds layers that a London or Sydney coach might miss if they've never worked here. Many executives, local and expat, operate inside cultures where professional success is woven into family identity. Filial piety doesn't stop at the office door. A stumble at work isn't just personal, it can feel like failing the people who sacrificed for your education, your visa, your place at the table. Here that pressure usually shows up as face-saving: a constant, quiet calculation about who gets to know you're struggling.

The expat version is different but no lighter. Your support network is eight time zones away. Your partner may not understand the pressure of client dinners you can't skip, or the quiet dread of underperforming in a city that notices. You're surrounded by people and structurally alone in the specific way that matters.

And underneath the isolation sits something heavier. For senior leaders, work isn't something you do. It's who you are.

When the job is going well, you feel like a better human. When it's shaky, even slightly uncertain, the doubt doesn't stay at the office. It follows you home, into how you talk to your kids, into the Sunday-night weight in your chest before a Monday you can't fully control. I spent two decades in global marketing before I retrained as a counsellor, and I wrote about that braiding of title, income and self in What I've Learned in 20 Years of Corporate Work. The performance identity trap is the same knot from another angle. When your whole identity is built on competence and forward momentum, admitting something isn't working feels like admitting you were never as good as you thought.

What a leader in that position needs is one person whose job is to hear the unsayable without consequence. Not a friend who'll worry, not a spouse who'll panic, not a colleague who'll use it politically. A confidential professional whose entire role is to help you think clearly when the org chart makes honest thinking impossible.

None of that is weakness. If anything, it's infrastructure.

What Executive Coaching Actually Is, and What It Isn't

Coaching is not remedial. It isn't a softer performance review, and it definitely isn't therapy with a corporate invoice attached. The core premise is simpler than most job descriptions make it sound: you take someone who is already performing well, often very well, and help them find the marginal gains hiding in the blind spots. The habits they can't see. The patterns their team won't name. The decision friction that costs more than anyone says out loud. That's the tenet Deno kept returning to: coaches are brought in for men and women who are typically already doing their job pretty well, not to repair someone who's broken.

That's how it's meant to work. The market doesn't always hold the line. In practice the phrase gets used both ways: some engagements sharpen a leader who is already good at the job, others are quiet fix-it mandates, a coach brought in when a senior person's behaviour has become a problem the board would rather not name. Both happen under the same label. The distinction worth protecting is that at its best, coaching sharpens strength. It doesn't repair failure.

That matters more in Hong Kong than in most markets, because this city runs on competence. You got here because you're good at what you do. Admitting you need help, even the professional, paid, confidential kind, can feel like admitting the whole story was a bluff. Coaching sidesteps that shame by framing the work as optimisation rather than rescue. You're good and getting better, and the coach is there to help you do it more cleanly.

Engagements are long. This is an extended process, not a one-off motivational session before a board presentation. Companies sponsor it because they expect a return, whether that's sharper decisions, better retention of their best people, or fewer avoidable management mistakes.

So if you're shopping for executive coaching in Hong Kong, you're looking for someone who works with high performers on performance, not someone who treats leadership as a pathology.

But coaching has a ceiling.

Where Coaching Ends and Therapy Begins

Doubt at the top doesn't stay proportionate. When the job is load-bearing for your entire sense of self, a bumpy quarter doesn't read as a bumpy quarter. It reads as exposure. Deno sees it in his own clients, many of whom come from cultures where "work success is sort of tied directly, positively correlated to personal success." When things get bumpy, or even just uncertain, "there's this doubt that comes in that can quite quickly take people to a place where they're catastrophizing."

Catastrophizing is the tell. When a leader starts imagining disasters the evidence doesn't support (everyone hates me, I'm about to be fired, my marriage is over because I had a bad quarter), coaching may still help with the performance frame. But the pattern underneath usually needs clinical work. That's the handoff point, and good coaches know it. It's what Deno calls his "duty of care as a performance coach," noticing when the work is veering toward an area he isn't qualified for, and, when someone is catastrophizing, wrestling with imposter syndrome, or dealing with marital issues or problems with the kids that bleed into their work, quickly advising them to speak to someone else.

Coaching isn't a clinical intervention, even when the coach happens to have a psychology background. Some executive coaches here are trained clinicians, and there are clinical psychologists and registered counsellors in Hong Kong who also coach, so the line between the two chairs can get genuinely blurry. It still holds. A coach can work with you on work stress, decision quality, leadership presence, and the emotional side of leading people. A coach should not be treating depression, trauma, addiction, or a marriage coming apart as performance problems to push through with frameworks.

I've sat with the kind of person this happens to. Details changed, several people blended into one, but the shape is real. A regional director, mid-forties, moved to Hong Kong for the job that was supposed to be proof of everything. On paper he was fine: numbers holding, team intact, bonus on track. He arrived through a coaching referral, because his coach had started to feel out of his depth. The "performance" problem was that the director had stopped sleeping and was drinking to claw back the last hour of the night.

The early sessions stayed on work, because work was the only language he had for any of it. It took a while before he mentioned, almost as an aside, that his father had died the year before he relocated and he hadn't gone back for the funeral. A deal was closing. He said it flatly, the way you'd report something that happened to a stranger. That was the thing. The job wasn't the wound. The job was the anaesthetic, and it had stopped working.

It didn't tie off neatly. He came for a while, went quiet for a couple of months when a reorganisation ate his calendar, then came back. That's often how it actually goes. What the coach got right was the handoff. He noticed the ground had shifted under the work, and he said so, instead of pressing on with tools built for a different problem.

If you're recognising yourself in the catastrophizing paragraph, that isn't coaching failing you. It's information. Therapy isn't a fallback for when coaching didn't work. Sometimes it's the right starting point, especially when the work stress is really about something older and deeper that the job is activating.

We sit on the therapy side of that line. I work with men navigating men's issues, performance pressure, anger, isolation, and addiction adjacent to high-functioning careers, in Central and online. The coaching conversation and the therapy conversation aren't rivals. They run in sequence or in parallel, depending on what you actually need. Setting boundaries at work is the sibling topic here: leaders who can't say no burn out in ways that look like coaching problems until they don't.

What Companies Actually Get for the Money

If you're an HR director or a CEO signing off on a coaching budget, you're allowed to ask the money question. The honest answer is that the return rarely shows up as a single ROI percentage on a spreadsheet. It's a composite: quicker calls under pressure, fewer decisions the leader has to walk back, and teams that hold together instead of bleeding good people. One axis Deno keeps coming back to is retention of "their better talent." Some turnover is normal, even healthy. Losing the people you most want to keep is the expensive kind, and it's exactly the kind a better-led team leaks less of.

Bad leaders export talent. Not always through cruelty, sometimes through inconsistency, avoidance, or the quiet signal that high performers won't be developed here. Coaching targets that leakage.

Decision quality is the other axis. Senior leaders make calls with incomplete information under time pressure, and coaching doesn't hand them a crystal ball. It gives them a thinking partner who helps separate ego from analysis, urgency from panic, confidence from denial.

For Hong Kong employers, the calculation usually includes retention of expat talent, people who will leave the city entirely if the role stops making sense. Replacing a senior hire here is expensive in money and in months. An engagement that keeps one key leader functional for an extra year pays for itself without anyone needing to run a heroic spreadsheet.

That said, coaching ROI is easier to narrate than to prove in a single KPI. Companies that treat it as remedial, a way to fix a broken leader, tend to underinvest. Companies that treat it as leadership infrastructure, a way to sharpen the people they already trust, get better outcomes and better stories.

How to Bring Executive Coaching Into Your Organisation

If you're closer to hiring than reading at this point, a few practical notes from how the good ones work and from what we see on the ground in Hong Kong.

• Start with a chemistry conversation. The first meeting is a fit check, for the individual and, when the company is sponsoring, for the organisational context. We run the same pattern on the therapy side, a free 20-minute chemistry call before anyone commits to ongoing work. Whatever the label, don't sign a multi-month contract with someone you can't be honest in front of.
• Nail down confidentiality up front, and know what it rests on. When an employer pays, leaders reasonably worry that coaching notes become HR ammunition. Corporate coaching usually runs on a tripartite agreement between coach, coachee, and sponsor, and the confidentiality it offers is contractual, not statutory. That distinction is real. A therapist's confidentiality in Hong Kong is shaped by health-care law, licensing regimes, and data-protection rules. A coach's is only as strong as the contract you sign. Many corporate arrangements also build in some feedback to HR at the aggregate level, the themes and direction of the work rather than the content of any session. The sponsor usually knows the goals, not what you actually said. Read the agreement, confirm exactly what gets reported, and get it in writing before you start.
• Ask what it costs, and don't be shy about it. Pricing varies by coach and by how long the engagement runs, and corporate programmes tend to stretch over months rather than a single session. A reputable coach will give you a straight answer in the first conversation.
• Define what success looks like before month two. Picture what would be different in six months if the work landed, whether that's retention on a specific team, a decision the leader has been avoiding, or a behaviour their direct reports have already named in feedback. Vague goals produce vague results.
• Know the therapy handoff before you need it. The best coaching relationships include a pre-agreed path to clinical support, and duty of care isn't boilerplate language. If your coach can't tell you when they'd refer you to a therapist, take that as a warning sign.
• Above all, don't wait for the crisis. The leaders who get the most from coaching start while they're still doing well, when there's enough stability to examine blind spots without everything being on fire. Waiting until the board is concerned turns a development tool into a rescue mission. Both can work, but one is cheaper in every sense.

Coaching veers into therapy territory more often than the org chart admits, and when it does, that's where we come in. Book a free chemistry call or reach out on WhatsApp if you want to talk about what's actually going on beneath the job title.